Eligibility
A client must be registered and have consulted the astrologer to be eligible to leave feedback.
BhriguSutra already supports ratings and reviews by registered clients who have consulted an astrologer. Understand how this supports transparency—and what it cannot prove.
The review eligibility rule limits participation to clients with a consultation relationship. A verified consultation is not a certification of astrological knowledge or accurate future predictions.
A client must be registered and have consulted the astrologer to be eligible to leave feedback.
Ratings help describe reported client satisfaction and experiences. Assess sample size, context and recency where published.
Public aggregate ratings provide one input alongside experience, credentials and professional methodology.
A good experience can contribute to an enduring record of client trust. This is the growth mechanism BhriguSutra is designed to support—not a promise of automatic referrals.
An astrologer serves a client.
A genuine client may leave a rating or review.
Consultation-backed feedback builds a public trust signal.
New clients can evaluate experience and professional background.
Follow-ups, repeat business and referrals become possible.
Verified eligibility is not a certification of prediction accuracy. Ratings reflect client experience; commercial results are not guaranteed.
A credible reputation system must resist fake reviews while protecting honest criticism and client privacy. These are governance priorities; verify which controls are already implemented.
No purchased favourable reviews or review incentives tied to a particular rating.
Do not expose private consultation details in public reviews without informed consent.
Provide transparent rules for authentic negative feedback, abuse and disputes.
Registered clients who have consulted the astrologer are eligible under the existing review feature. Additional consultation verification methods should be checked against production.
No. Trust requires authentic feedback rather than paid positive sentiment or manipulation.
No. Ratings concern client experience; verification should refer to consultation eligibility, not guaranteed predictive outcomes.
Negative feedback can be genuine. The production policy must describe content moderation, factual disputes and appeal mechanisms.
The earlier MVP specification allows public aggregates but not client-specific named reviews. Confirm actual production exposure before publishing identifiable testimonials.
Explore the founding programme, including its benefits, qualification criteria and prototype access options.