Good questions deserve clear answers.

Registered clients who have consulted the astrologer are eligible under the existing review feature. Additional consultation verification methods should be checked against production.

No. Trust requires authentic feedback rather than paid positive sentiment or manipulation.

No. Ratings concern client experience; verification should refer to consultation eligibility, not guaranteed predictive outcomes.

Negative feedback can be genuine. The production policy must describe content moderation, factual disputes and appeal mechanisms.

The earlier MVP specification allows public aggregates but not client-specific named reviews. Confirm actual production exposure before publishing identifiable testimonials.

A professional relationship is not exclusive ownership of a person. Privacy rights and service permissions apply separately.

The original site positions fees as the practitioner’s decision, subject to current commercial terms.

The original template states no intermediary commission on consultation fees. Other service, payment-processing or subscription fees must be separately disclosed.

The available source does not establish a definitive platform marketing restriction. This requires an explicit approved policy.

Client record export and account exit rights need confirmed implementation and contractual terms.

The documented MVP model supports membership in more than one astrologer ecosystem; the client’s data must be access-controlled.

Earlier requirements contemplated astrologer access to client-entered information. Stronger granular consent and privacy design should be confirmed before launch.

No. The product strategy positions AI as a practitioner copilot, with professional oversight.

Yes. Professional judgement is not replaced by generated content.

Check deterministic chart facts, review outputs and do not communicate uncertain high-stakes claims as settled truth.

Independent messaging remains possible; any integrated WhatsApp automation must be verified for channel availability and consent.

The MVP plan includes a branded client mobile experience. Other access routes must be confirmed.

No comprehensive live feature inventory is established by the materials. The website should identify available and planned capabilities precisely.

The current promotional deadline is 15 January 2027.

The existing founding programme states free registration. Eligibility and platform access conditions apply.

It is the stated combined promotional value of service entitlements, not a cash grant or guaranteed saving.

Up to 500 clients for one year (₹799), 151 annual branded mobile licences (₹7,399), 20 AI reports (₹980), ₹1,500 consultation credits, and 161 agent runs (₹322).

Standard subscription, credit, licence and validity terms must be approved and disclosed before presenting a binding price commitment.

The uploaded site contains prototype access. A production registration endpoint has not been supplied in the website package.

Yes. Birth details can be personal information and should receive appropriate security and access controls.

The materials do not establish a final provider-training policy. Confirm contract, vendor settings, retention and consent before publishing a guarantee.

Earlier MVP requirements include account, journal and family-record deletion rights. The final implementation and privacy notice must explain scope and exceptions.

No. Jyotish interpretation does not guarantee outcomes and should not replace qualified professional advice for high-stakes decisions.